USPTO serial 75975946
THERE ARE NO RULES!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THERE ARE NO RULES!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen J. Smith
KAREN J SMITH LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY & BEGLER, PC708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed instructional and teaching materials in the field of sports and entertainment; note paper dispensers; general feature and sports; fitness and entertainment magazines; newspapers in the field of sports, fitness and entertainment; paper shopping bags; calendars; mounted and unmounted photographs; playing and trading cards; road maps; athletic contest books and journals; catalogs for the sale of athletic merchandise; envelopes, cardboard and paper cartons; blank and picture postcards; notecards; note pads; greeting cards; cookbooks; activity and coloring books; puffy stickers; adhesive stickers; photograph albums; memorandum books; pens; pencils; folders and portfolios for papers; notebooks and binders; letter openers; memo holders; pennants made of paper and mounted on sticks; diaries; clipboards; book covers; book marks; bulletin boards; erasable memo boards; pen and pencil holders; paper clip holders; paper clip holders; paper weights; paper napkins and towels; posters; writing paper and stationery; drawing paper; wrapping paper; luminous paper; graphics paper; magnetic vinyl signs and stickers; paper banners; decals and windshield decals strips; collector decals and collector decals with display sheets; bumper stickers and strips; plastic water filled snow globes; memo pads; erasers; stationery holders; maps; desk sets; color lithograph sticker books; postcard books; holographic cards, pencil bags; pencil sharpeners; gift wrap sets; gift boxes; comic books; bookmarks; posterbooks; paper, party and lawn signs; stamp pads; stamps; score, check and autograph books; tape dispensers; corrugated cardboard storage boxes and corrugated closet wardrobes and storage boxes; reflective paper stock; wooden desk boxes; instructional craft books | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |