USPTO serial 75975990
DR. SEUSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DR. SEUSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Audrey S. Geisel and Karl ZoBell, both U.S. citizens, as co-trustees of The 1984 Geisel Trust
La Jolla, CA
La Jolla, CA
La Jolla, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY O. DIX
NANCY O DIX GRAY CARY WARE & FRIEDENRICH401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books featuring children's stories | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Audrey S. Geisel and Karl ZoBell, both U.S. citizens, as co-trustees of The 1984 Geisel Trust
- Other trademarks owned by DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named DR. SEUSS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 29, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |