USPTO serial 75976038
GUILT FREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2096125Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 9, 1997
- Examiner
- LEE, TERESA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GUILT FREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Kegan
Daniel Kegan Kegan & Kegan, Ltd79 W Monroe st #1310Chicago, IL 60603-4969UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by YARNELL ICE CREAM, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Yarnell Ice Cream Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Yarnell Ice Cream Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GUILT FREE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |