USPTO serial 75976045
SOUTH BEACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2175195Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 1998
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOUTH BEACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
SOUTH BEACH BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC.
NORWALK, CT
Other trademarks owned by SOUTH BEACH BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELIZABETH N. BILUS
ELIZABETH N BILUS PEPSICO INC700 ANDERSON HILL RDPURCHASE, NY 10577UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | tea | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SALACUSE, FRANK
- Other trademarks owned by SALACUSE, FRANK
- Other trademarks owned by SALACUSE, FRANK
- Other trademarks owned by SOUTH BEACH BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SOUTH BEACH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |