USPTO serial 75976078
TOMMY BAHAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2001
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TOMMY BAHAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Atlanta, GA
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret Heaton
Mary Margaret Heaton Oxford Industries, Inc.999 Peachtree St NE, Suite 688Atlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TOMMY BAHAMA GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named TOMMY BAHAMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2021 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 16, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 16, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |