Drawing for INTERACT

USPTO serial 75976085

INTERACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ned T. Himmelrich

LOAN B KENNEDY ESQ RECOTON CORPORATION2950 LAKE EMMA RDLAKE MARY, FL 32746UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer accessories, namely controllers, loudspeakers, microphones, headsets; mice, and trackballs, and computer software for providing general educational information in an entertaining mannerABANDONEDAug 22, 1995
028computer game and video accessories, namely joysticks, computer game joysticks, computer game cards, hand-held units for playing video games; computer software for video games and computer software for entertaining educational computer gamesABANDONEDMay 29, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 1998PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Jan 23, 1998PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 1997ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
May 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 1997SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 25, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 2, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 2, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 10, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 26, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 1995REINREINSTATED—
May 16, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance