USPTO serial 75976135
SMASH BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMASH BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Culver City, CA
Culver City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN ZAFMAN
NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | watches and jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | leather diary holders, leather agenda holders, and leather calendar holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | wallets, brush rolls sold empty, luggage, briefcases, cosmetic cases sold empty, purses, felt pouches, drawstring pouches, tote bags, and waist packs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DJF Enterprises
- Other trademarks owned by DJF Enterprises
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named SMASH BOX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |