USPTO serial 75976325
SUNRYPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2104336Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 1997
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUNRYPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H. DEITS
David H. Deits Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200Seattle, WA 98101-3045UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |