USPTO serial 75976528
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH D HERNANDEZ
JOSEPH D HERNANDEZ WISE & SHEPARD LLP3030 HANSEN WAY STE 100PALO ALTO, CA 94304-1006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer software consulting services | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |