USPTO serial 75976566
LORAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LORAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LA JOLLA, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY O DIX
NANCY O DIX GRAY CARY WARE & FRIEDENRICH401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing articles and apparel, namely pants and shorts made of all processes including knits and wovens, in all infant, children's and adult sizes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DR. SEUSS ENTERPRISES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Audrey S. Geisel and Karl ZoBell, as the Co-Trustees of The 1984 Geisel Trust Under Trust Agreement Dated August 27, 1984
- Other trademarks owned by Audrey S. Geisel and Karl ZoBell, as the Co-Trustees of The 1984 Geisel Trust Under Trust Agreement Dated August 27, 1984
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LORAX
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |