USPTO serial 75976747
MAKING PLANTS THE ANSWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAKING PLANTS THE ANSWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London W1Y 6LN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel G. Ackerman
JOEL G ACKERMAN ZENECA INC1200 S 47TH STRICHMOND, CA 94804UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | plant DNA sequences for transforming plants | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | reports, pamphlets, instruction manuals, reprints of technical and/or business articles, printed press releases, photographic prints and informational flyers all relating to the fields of agriculture and/or biotechnology | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1994 |
| 035 | business consultation and advisory services for companies in the field of biotechnology, relating to market research, advertising and marketing, production, and sales and distribution for biotechnological products and distributing reports, pamphlets, instruction manuals, reprints of technical and/or business articles, printed press releases and informational flyers associated therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting classes, seminars, workshops and conferences in the field of biotechnology and distributing reports, pamphlets, instruction manuals, reprints of technical and/or business articles, printed press releases and informational flyers associated therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | promoting public awareness of the need for biotechnological research and biotechnological products; research services in the fields of biotechnology and agriculture; agricultural consulting services, technical consulting services in the field of biotechnology including consultation services relating to product development and distributing reports, pamphlets, instruction manuals, reprints of technical and/or business articles, printed press releases and informational flyers associated therewith | ABANDONED | Jun 27, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZENECA LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAKING PLANTS THE ANSWER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |