USPTO serial 75977158
MURRAY BROS. CADDYSHACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 2003
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MURRAY BROS. CADDYSHACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Augustine, FL
St. Augustine, FL
CS VENTURES LLC, C/O MURRAY BROS. CADDYS
ST. AUGUSTINE, FL
Other trademarks owned by CS VENTURES LLC, C/O MURRAY BROS. CADDYS
St. Augustine, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Chesal
Michael B. Chesal Peretz Chesal & Herrmann, P.L.1 S.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 1820SunTrust International CenterMiami, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant, bar and restaurant carry-out services | ACTIVE | Jun 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bunker Ventures
- Other trademarks owned by Bunker Ventures
- Other trademarks owned by CS VENTURES LLC, C/O MURRAY BROS. CADDYS
- Other trademarks owned by Bunker Ventures
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named MURRAY BROS. CADDYSHACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 9, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 9, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |