USPTO serial 75977200
BILL BLASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BILL BLASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sue Nam
Legal Manager, Brands NexCen Brands, Inc.1330 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | eyeglass cases, top zipper style camera bags and binocular cases | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | leather goods, namely handbag totes, satchels, backpacks, knapsacks (non-travel type), all kinds of flap bags, hobo bags, daytime and evening clutch bags multi-compartment handbags, drawstring pouches and bags, sling bags, bucket shaped bags, frame bags, waist pouches, evening bags, mini handbags, school bags, change purses, key cases, french purses (with and without frame), wallets, passport cases, continental wallets, frame purses, business card cases, and credit card cases | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | leather belts | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1978 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |