USPTO serial 75977325
REGATTA SPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REGATTA SPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George Gottlieb
GEORGE GOTTLIEB GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | blankets, comforters, convent blankets, throws, wall hangings (textile), wash cloths, bath linen, mattress pads, toilet-seat covers, shower curtains, sheets, chair pads, oven mitts, pot holders, toaster covers, dish cloths, pillow cases, towels, dish cloths, quilts, beach towels, bedspreads, tablecloths (non-paper), tapestry of textile, linens, draperies, aprons, coasters (non-paper), fabric covers for kitchen appliances, napkins (non-paper), place mats (non-paper) and table mats (non-paper) | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1998 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 29, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |