USPTO serial 75977651
ARNOLD ZEGARELLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARNOLD ZEGARELLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregg R. Zegarelli
GREGG R ZEGARELLIALLEGHENY BLDG ELEVENTH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1616UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes, namely, perfume, cologne and toilet water, non-medicated cosmetics and beauty products, namely, eye pencils, eye liner, matte cake liner for the eyes, eyeliner seal, eye lid oil, eye shadow, eye mask, skin lightener, eye makeup remover, eyebrow seal, eyebrow pencil, mascara, cover base, foundation make up, face powder, liquid powder, powder blush, cream blush, lip pencil, lipstick, lip gloss, lipstick sealer, makeup remover, cotton makeup remover pads, moisturizing lotion, skin moisturizer, skin toner, skin freshener, cleansing cream, beauty mask, lip balm, eye moisturizing cream, eye gel, body powder, body toner, bath powder, talcum powder, lip balm, lip cream, lip gloss, lip liner, lipstick, eye, make-up and make-up foundations, bath oils, skin cleansers, sun block, sun creams, sun screen, suntanning preparations, creams, moisturizers, lotions for the skin, face and body; non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, hair shampoo and cleansers, hair spray, hair conditioner, hair gel, hair mousse, hair rinses, and hair styling preparations; nail products, namely, nail care preparations, nail buffing preparations, nail polish, nail enamel, nail hardeners, and nail tips | ACTIVE | Mar 20, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |