USPTO serial 75977697
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A EPSTEIN
MICHAEL A EPSTEIN WEIL GOTSHAL & MANAGES LLP767 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | tableware not of precious metal, namely, knives, forks, and spoons; tableware of sterling silver, namely, knives, forks, and spoons; and gardening tools, namely, trowels, weeding forks, spades and hoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | indoor and outdoor furniture; pillows; mirrors; and plastic and non-metal key chains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |