USPTO serial 75977726
MURCHIE'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 1999
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MURCHIE'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 2Y5, CA
Richmond, British Columbia V6V 2M4, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 2Y5, CA
MURCHIE'S TEA AND COFFEE (2007) LTD.
Delta, BC, V4G 1K9, CA
Other trademarks owned by MURCHIE'S TEA AND COFFEE (2007) LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Cooper
1007 Fort Street, Suite 201Victoria, BC, V8V3K5CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | tea; coffee; spices [; pastries; namely, fruit flans, torts, and tortiers; chocolate truffels; breakfast cereals; breads; sandwiches; quiches; and pasta salads ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Murchie's Tea & Coffee Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Murchie's Tea & Coffee Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Murchie's Tea & Coffee Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by MURCHIE'S TEA AND COFFEE (2007) LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MURCHIE'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 14, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 14, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1994 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 7, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |