USPTO serial 75977818
MAX & CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2211314Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 15, 1998
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAX & CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A. GROW
MICHAEL A GROW ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes, [ colognes, toilet water, dentifrices bath gels, bath oils, bath powder, body powder, non-medicated bath salts, body creams, hand cream, night cream, body oils, skin creams, skin emollients, skin lotions, massage oils, moisturizers, skin cleansing creams and lotions; skin toners, skin soaps, toilet soaps, liquid soaps for hand, face and body, deodorant soap; cosmetics, namely, beauty masks, compacts, cosmetic pencils, cold creams, eye creams, hair removing creams, skin lighteners, eye makeup, facial makeup, foundation makeup, eye makeup remover, eye pencils, eye shadow, eyebrow pencils, mascara, lipstick; hair gels, hair mousses, hair conditioners, hair waving lotions, deodorant for personal use, shaving gels ] | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |