USPTO serial 75977831
3NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 3NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 S 1ST ST STE 1205SAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Repairing and upgrading computer hardware networks in the following fields-- real estate brokerage and development, manufacturing, distribution, retail stores, and retail of high-technology equipment and consumer products | ABANDONED | Feb 18, 1998 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating web sites for others; developing and implementing computer hardware networks; research and development for others in the field of computer hardware networks | ABANDONED | Feb 18, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |