USPTO serial 75977978
CENTER FOR QUALITY OF MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2299119Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 1999
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CENTER FOR QUALITY OF MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER C LANDO
DOUGLAS R WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | education services, namely, conducting seminars in the field of management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Center for Quality of Management, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Center for Quality of Management, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CENTER FOR QUALITY OF MANAGEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 23, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |