Drawing for CE ONESOURCE

USPTO serial 75977980

CE ONESOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BONNET, ODETTE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CE ONESOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL J NOBLITT

DAVID O. CAPLAN SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 E. VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs and manuals therefor for use in information and communications systems related to the professional financial planning field for students, schools, and prospective employers; prerecorded audio tapes, video tapes, computer discs and accompanying computer templates and notebooks sold as a unit featuring classes, courses, seminars, lectures and related presentations for professional continuing education in the field of financial planning and related business servicesACTIVE—
035clerical and data processing services for tracking and maintaining records of professional continuing education courses in the field of financial planning completed by graduatesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 8, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 24, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 13, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance