USPTO serial 75977987
CASINO NIAGARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2008
- Examiner
- THOMPSON,HEATHER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CASINO NIAGARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ONTARIO LOTTERY AND GAMING CORPORATION
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by ONTARIO LOTTERY AND GAMING CORPORATION
ONTARIO LOTTERY AND GAMING CORPORATION
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by ONTARIO LOTTERY AND GAMING CORPORATION
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven A. Abreu
Steven A. Abreu Abreu Karol LLC770 Legacy Place, 2nd FloorDedham, MA 02026United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, the operation of a casino | ACTIVE | Dec 7, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ONTARIO LOTTERY AND GAMING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ONTARIO LOTTERY AND GAMING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ONTARIO CASINO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CASINO NIAGARA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 9, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 4, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 29, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |