USPTO serial 75978378
OKLAHOMA REDHAWKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2304382Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 1999
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OKLAHOMA REDHAWKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oklahoma City, OK
Oklahoma City, OK
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
Oklahoma City, OK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Scott Poley
D SCOTT POLEY PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL PROMOTION CORP201 BAYSHORE DR SESAINT PETERSBURG, FL 33701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS AND SPORTING GOODS; NAMELY, BASEBALLS, BASEBALL BATS, TOY BASEBALL BATTING HELMETS, BASEBALL BATTING GLOVES, BASEBALL GLOVES, TALKING BASEBALL GAMES, PLAYING CARDS, SPORT BALLS, BALLOONS, BASEBALL BATS, BASEBALL MITTS AND DOLLS | EXPIRED | Nov 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OKC Athletic Club, LP
- Other trademarks owned by OKC Athletic Club, LP
- Other trademarks owned by OKC ATHLETIC CLUB, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OKC Athletic Club, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named OKLAHOMA REDHAWKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |