USPTO serial 75978522
SEEMORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEEMORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP G MALEK
PHILIP G MALEK LUCASH GESMER & UPDEGROVE LLP40 BROAD STBOSTON, MA 02109-4310UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, calendars, gift cards, greeting cards, cartoon prints, cartoon strips, comic books, comic strips, coloring books, picture books, children's books, coasters made of paper, souvenir programs regarding shops, historical displays and trolley, aquarium or museum tours, stickers, and bumper stickers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |