USPTO serial 75978590
OZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W LEWIS VENABLE, BAETJER AND HOWARD LLPP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software programs for use as a part of a global computer network, namely, programs for multi-user communication and three-dimensional representations | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational and training services, namely, conducting distance learning through classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops on a global computer network, in the field of language learning, history, sociology, philosophy, engineering, mathematics, physics, biology, medicine and other sciences; multimedia entertainment software production development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |