USPTO serial 75978619
FRANKLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRANKLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M4V 1E2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN D. REICHMAN
JONATHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Tote bags, backpacks, overnight bags, roll bags, belt bags, diaper bags, soft luggage, duffel bags, coin purses, wallets, hand bags, book bags, knapsacks, key case holders, all for children | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | children's clothing, footwear and headwear, namely, hats, bandanas, gloves, ski gloves, scarves, mufflers, ear muffs, head bands, slipper socks, ponchos, sleepwear, costumes, sandals, hiking shoes, boots, sneakers, canvas shoes, leather shoes, slippers, plush slipper socks, shorts, pants, jeans, tops, bottoms, dresses, coveralls, rompers, overalls, shortalls, onesies, sweaters, layettes, pajamas, jackets, windsuits, bibs, snow suits, skiwear, T-shirts, smocks, swimwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |