Drawing for CENTEX

USPTO serial 75978634

CENTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANNA CONYERS KUHN

ANNA CONYERS KUHN BAKER & BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-2980UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMSACTIVE—
042LEASING OF SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS TO OTHERS; SECURITY ALARM MONITORING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 31, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 21, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 2, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 1, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 1999DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance