USPTO serial 75978686
SPUNKY ROX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2004
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPUNKY ROX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stoneage Creations Canada, Inc.
Nanton, Alberta, CA
Stoneage Creations Canada, Inc.
Nanton, Alberta, CA
Stoneage Creations Canada, Inc.
Nanton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Grow
MICHAEL A GROW ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN AND KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stoneage Creations Canada, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stoneage Creations Canada, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stoneage Creations Canada, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SPUNKY ROX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |