USPTO serial 75978762
LET'S MAKE THINGS BETTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LET'S MAKE THINGS BETTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernestine C. Bartlett
ERNESTINE C BARTLETT CORPORATIONPHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA580 WHITE PLAINS RDTARRYTOWN, NY 10591Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MRI diagnostic apparatus, radiological apparatus for medical purposes, ultrasonic medical diagnostic apparatus, ultrasound diagnostic apparatus, X-ray apparatus for medical use, X-ray diagnostic apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named LET'S MAKE THINGS BETTER
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |