Drawing for CONTRAST CULTURE COURAGE

USPTO serial 75978764

CONTRAST CULTURE COURAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CONTRAST CULTURE COURAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL F KRIEGER

MICHAEL F KRIEGER KIRTON & MCCONKIE1800 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021hair combs; cleaning combs; scouring sponges; sponges for household purposes; sponges for applying body powder; clothes brushes; cosmetic brushes; dish washing brushes; dusting brushes; eyebrow brushes; file brushes; fireplace brushes; floor brushes; hair brushes; horse brushes; lamp glass brushes; mushroom brushes; nail brushes; pot cleaning brushes; scraping brushes; scrubbing brushes; shaving brushes; shoe brushes; toilet brushes; tooth brushes; brushes for basting meat; brushes for footwear; brushes for parquet floors; brushes for pets; brushes for use on bark of trees; wire brushes, not being machine parts; material for brush making; impregnated cleaning cloths; cleaning cloths; cleaning mitts of fabric; cleaning pads; cleaning rags; steel wool for cleaning; pre-moistened towelettes for household cleaning; glass bowls; glass boxes; glass busts; glass casters; glass figures; glass figurines; enameled glass; ground plate glass; opal glass; opaline glass; polished plate glass; pressed glass; smoothed plate glass; speckled glass; spun glass; stained glass; stamped glass; unwrought glass; glass beverageware; glass jars for jams and jellies; glass knobs; glass mugs; glass ornaments, not Christmas tree ornaments; glass pans; glass sculptures; glass statues; glass statuettes; porcelain busts; porcelain doorknobs; porcelain eggs; porcelain figures; porcelain figurines; porcelain jars for jams and jellies; porcelain knobs; porcelain mugs; porcelain ornaments, not including Christmas tree ornaments; porcelain sculptures; porcelain statues; porcelain statuettes; earthenware figures; earthenware figurines; earthenware jars for jams and jellies; earthenware mugs; earthenware sculptures; earthenware statues; earthenware statuettesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 1999SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 4, 1999DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 2, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 8, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 10, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance