USPTO serial 75978790
EGAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EGAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Langhorne, PA
Langhorne, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | interactive software games, video games and entertainment programs for various platforms, namely, personal computers and online applications | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |