USPTO serial 75978947
V VICTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2933446Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2005
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with V VICTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DALLAS, TX
Hillwood Development Corporation
Dallas, TX
Hillwood Development Corporation
Dallas, TX
DALLAS, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN L SAPP
STEPHEN L SAPP LOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP2200 ROSS AVE STE 2200DALLAS, TX 75201-6776UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing arena facilities for sports, entertainment, tradeshows, exhibitions and conventions; providing facilities for recreation activities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORY INTANGIBLES, LP
- Other trademarks owned by Hillwood Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Hillwood Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by VICTORY INTANGIBLES, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named V VICTORY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |