USPTO serial 75979001
K KONGSKILDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 26, 1999
- Examiner
- BERMAN, ALLISON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with K KONGSKILDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DK-4180 Soro, DK
ALBERTSLUND, 2620, DK
DK-4180 Soro, DK
DK-4180 Soro, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
Andrew N. Spivak Mosaic Legal Group, PLLC5185 MacArthur Boulevard, NW, Suite 350Washington, DC 20016-3341UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | agriculture machines for preparing the soil, namely, ploughs, cultivators, seed drills, manure distributors, fertilizer distributors and weed killer distributors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kongskilde Maskinfabrik A/S
- Other trademarks owned by CNH INDUSTRIAL DANMARK A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Kongskilde Maskinfabrik A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Kongskilde Maskinfabrik A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named K KONGSKILDE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 10, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 10, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | ERTR | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 16, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |