USPTO serial 75979112
VIRGIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRGIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. DABNEY
JAMES W DABNEY PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and fragrances, namely, perfumes, eau de cologne, toilet water, essential oils for personal use and shaving preparations; skin care preparations and make-up products, namely, foundation creams and lotions, face powders, baby powder, talcum powders, lipsticks, lip gloss, blusher, eye make-up, suntanning and sunscreening preparations; and nail care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | holograms; mounted photographs; fictional and non-fictional books and paperback books, greeting cards, postcards, and golf scorecards; writing instruments, namely, fountain pens | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Leisurewear, namely, lounging suits, sweat suits, sweat pants, gym shorts, jogging suits, warm-up suits, fleece bottoms, pullovers and jerseys; articles of underclothing, namely, vests, underpants, pants, camisoles, knickers, articles of outer clothing, namely, waist coats, sweaters, cardigans and leggings, articles of sports clothing, namely shorts, track suits, swimwear, swimming trunks and leotards | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | video game programs; video game cartridges; hand held electronic games; toys, games and playthings, namely, stuffed animals, model airplanes, sporting articles, namely, golf balls | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business organization promotional consulting for others; promoting and advertising the goods and services of others by airships and air balloons; and preparing outdoor advertising for others such as by billboards | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Air travel services, namely, transportation of goods and passengers by road and air; tourist agency services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of amusement parks, entertainment in the nature of amusement arcades, entertainment in the nature of video game amusement centres featuring coin and token operated game machines and coin and token operated virtual reality machines, and entertainment in the nature of providing coin and token operated game machines and coin and token operated virtual reality machines in hotels or other public accommodations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Retail store services in the fields of sheet music, photography, handbags, purses, games, video game machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIRGIN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |