USPTO serial 75979175
CYBERCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY N MAUSNER
JEFFREY N MAUSNER BERMAN BLANCHARD MAUSNER & RESSER4727 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90010-3874UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | TRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELDS OF TELEPHONE ANSWERING TELEMARKETING, TELESERVICING IN THE NATURE OF RECEIVING AND RESPONDING TO TELEPHONE AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK INQUIRIES FROM CUSTOMERS OF OTHER BUSINESSES, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 1999 |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES; DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES; PRODUCT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; CUSTOMER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING INFORMATION, ANSWERING QUESTIONS, ASSISTING WITH TECHNICAL PROBLEMS, AND SALES PROMOTION ADVICE; AND COMPUTER AND CALL CENTER DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TeleTech Customer Care Management (California), Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TeleTech Customer Care Management (California), Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CYBERCARE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |