USPTO serial 75979308
BAKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3875200Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 2010
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BAKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ST. LOUIS, MO
St. Louis, MO
North Miami, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
Webster Groves, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ shoe polishes, shoe oils, and shoe polish with a sponge applicator ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1997 |
| 009 | [ sunglasses ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1997 |
| 014 | [ jewelry ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1997 |
| 018 | wallets, backpacks, and handbags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1997 |
| 021 | [ shoe brushes and shoe sponges ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1997 |
| 026 | [ hair ornaments and hair accessories, namely, salon clips, hairpins, barrettes, hairsticks, combs, snap clips, hairclaws, ponytail holders, hair bands, and hair bows ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Edison Brothers Stores, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ZIGI USA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BAKERS 2013, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BAKERS FOOTWEAR GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named BAKERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 16, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 30, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |