Drawing for Serial No. 75979331

USPTO serial 75979331

Serial No. 75979331

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2742670Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 29, 2003
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75979331?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth A. Corradino, Esq.

Elizabeth A. Corradino, Esq. MOSES & SINGER LLP405 LEXINGTON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10174-1299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys, games and playthings, namely, board games, stuffed toys, plush toys, infants' rattles, action figures, [ building blocks,] playground balls and musical toysEXPIREDMar 27, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 6, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 6, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 9, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 31, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 25, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 14, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 4, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 8, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 5, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 11, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance