USPTO serial 75979554
SILVER ARROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SILVER ARROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Flat 14, London SW74AN, GB
SAE SILVER ARROW ESTABLISHMENT
VADUZ, LI
London, SW1L3TN, GB
SAE SILVER ARROW ESTABLISHMENT
VADUZ, LI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD N HUFF
DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT, PLLC1300 I ST N WTHIRD FL WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FRUIT FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS; CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS; CARBONATED, FRUIT FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ABU ZALAF, ZIAD
- Other trademarks owned by SAE SILVER ARROW ESTABLISHMENT
- Other trademarks owned by JUNDZILL, KAZIMIERZ BALINSKI
- Other trademarks owned by SAE SILVER ARROW ESTABLISHMENT
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SILVER ARROW
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |