USPTO serial 75979598
COMMUNITIES.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMUNITIES.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R GWEN PETERSON
R GWEN PETERSON TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in software development, for use in creating sites on a global computer networks in the fields of music and entertainment and communications, for use in accessing global computer networks and global computer network databases, for use in the development and operation of computerized virtual worlds, on-line gaming and on-line chat, for use in designing and building software applications for use on a local area network or a global computer network, and for communications between users and with computerized sites for purposes of on-line entertainment, on-line gaming, on-line chatting and the exchange and sharing of text, graphics and audiovisual and multimedia information, and instructional manuals provided therewith | ACTIVE | Feb 26, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |