USPTO serial 75979672
TOMMY BAHAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2381910Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2000
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOMMY BAHAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret Heaton
Mary Margaret Heaton Oxford Industries, Inc.999 Peachtree St NE, Suite 688Atlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | towels [, fabric bathmats ][and oilcloth mats] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TOMMY BAHAMA GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named TOMMY BAHAMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2023 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |