USPTO serial 75979738
THE GREAT PLATTE RIVER ROAD ARCHWAY MONUMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 2001
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE GREAT PLATTE RIVER ROAD ARCHWAY MONUMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN D. FERGEMANN
BRIAN D. FERGEMANN WINSTON & STRAWN LLP35 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing educational and entertainment services in a theme park featuring historical exhibits, informational exhibits, free standing historical displays, sculptures, amusement park rides, collections of historical information and memorabilia, informational kiosks and/or multimedia presentations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |