USPTO serial 75979834
VIRTUAL FLOWER BOUQUET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 2002
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIRTUAL FLOWER BOUQUET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Internet Florist Association, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Other trademarks owned by Internet Florist Association, Inc.
Internet Florist Association, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Other trademarks owned by Internet Florist Association, Inc.
Internet Florist Association, Inc.
St. Paul, MN
Other trademarks owned by Internet Florist Association, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Alton
BRIAN D ALTON MCCLAY ALTON, PLLP951 GRAND AVESAINT PAUL, MN 55105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail store services featuring fresh flowers, cut flower arrangements, and artificial flowers, blooming and green plants, and balloons, gifts, and novelty items | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 19, 1996 |
| 039 | delivery of gifts and flowers with selected items regarding a particular occasion or theme | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 19, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Internet Florist Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Internet Florist Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Internet Florist Association, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named VIRTUAL FLOWER BOUQUET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 21, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |