USPTO serial 75979854
DAZZLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 26, 2000
- Examiner
- HORRALL, PATRICIA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DAZZLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLEY A MORADIAN
LESLEY A MORADIAN ESTEE LAUDER INC767 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | women's fragrances, namely, body creams, body powders and shower and bath gel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |