USPTO serial 75979918
SIERRA TEL COMMUNICATIONS GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIERRA TEL COMMUNICATIONS GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE J SISKIND
LAWRENCE J SISKIND COOPER WHITE & COOPER201 CALIFORNIA ST 17TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, audio teleconferencing, cellular telephone services, data and voice telecommunication, directory information services, electronic mail services, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage, and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone, facsimile transmission, ISDN services, gateway services, operator services, telephone network access services, paging services, PBX dialing services, PABX dialing services, rental of telecommunication equipment, telephone communication services, video teleconferencing, videotext services, wireless digital messaging services, and wireless facsimile mail services, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network | ACTIVE | Oct 19, 1997 |
| 041 | computer education training services; computer education training; training in the use of computers | ACTIVE | Oct 19, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2000 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 14, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |