USPTO serial 75979988
ICESPIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICESPIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Berenato
JOSEPH W BERENATO LINIAK & BERENATO LLC6550 ROCK SPRING DR STE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | maintenance services, namely, freezing of fluid lines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |