Drawing for FTP-TELNET COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 75980051

FTP-TELNET COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COOK, BRADLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FTP-TELNET COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas E. White

DOUGLAS E WHITE14 CAMINO SOBRANTEORINDA, CA 94563UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042custom writing services for others, namely, creative, business, and technical writingACTIVEJun 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2001CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Aug 21, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Feb 13, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 6, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 25, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 25, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance