USPTO serial 75980161
DECATHLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DECATHLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
59650 Villeneuve D'Ascq, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VIRGIL H MARSH
VIRGIL H MARSH FISHER CHRISTEN & SABOL1019 19TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Rowboats, kayaks and rowing shells | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |