USPTO serial 75980225
DENTAL EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2001
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DENTAL EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERALD B NAGAE
JERALD B NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computerized on-line retail services, mail order catalog services, mail order services and retail store services in the field of dental hygiene products, namely, dental rinse, dental adhesives, dental cleaning preparations, dental floss, dental picks, dental brushes, tooth gel, toothpaste and hygienic and therapeutic irrigation appliances, jet-liquid-emitting fixtures and power toothbrush units for use therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 16, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |