USPTO serial 75980475
BUSH FOR PRESIDENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BUSH FOR PRESIDENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Colaianni
JOSEPH V COLAIANNI PATTON BOGGS LLP2550 M ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bush For President, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bush For President, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BUSH FOR PRESIDENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |