USPTO serial 75980549
OPTICARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2001
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with OPTICARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOSTON, MA
OPTICARD PAYMENT SERVICES, INC.
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
Open Payment Technologies, Inc.
Phoenix, AZ
Open Payment Technologies, Inc.
Phoenix, AZ
BROOMFIELD, CO
Open Payment Technologies, Inc.
Phoenix, AZ
BOSTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence K. Nodine
Lawrence K. Nodine Ballard Spahr LLP999 Peachtree Street Ste. 1600Atlanta, GA 30309-3915UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MAGNETICALLY ENCODED CARDS USED FOR CREDIT AND DEBIT AND CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS, FREQUENT SHOPPER PROGRAMS, OR ELECTRONIC COUPON CARDS | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2000 |
| 035 | PROMOTING THE SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH A FREQUENT SHOPPER DISCOUNT PROGRAM AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRONIC COUPON CARDS | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAYAN LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OPTICARD PAYMENT SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Open Payment Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Open Payment Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TSYS MERCHANT SOLUTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Open Payment Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MERCHANTWAREHOUSE.COM LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named OPTICARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 25, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 3, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 23, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |